Inclusion is the your typical classroom that all children are expected to attend when they enter school.For some children like those with special needs inclusion may not be the answer. Mainstreaming is an option but as the article states it did not work the hopes were for that children with disabilities to succeed on their own in a typical classroom. Mainstreaming basically says, "We won't change the regular classroom, the curriculum, the teaching, or pay much attention to the social environment, but if you can succeed here, you are allowed to stay." That theological thinking will not work for those kids who need that extra push, or attention help be successful. The whole point of special education,inclusion, and resource rooms are to be available to the students to use them. In my past experiences with all three of these types of room many times the kids went to either two of the rooms for a short period of the day or in a rare occurrence all three rooms have been seen by a particular student. Inclusion should be used when appropriate. I am all for including all types of students in activities but if a student is not going to gain anything from that room setting then you are only hurting the child forcing them to stay. Same works for a student who does not need to be in a resource room setting if they need only to be reminded to keep focus. I always believe to try putting students in an inclusion type setting but if no improvement can be made and the student is only hurting himself or herself then there has to be a better solution to the problem.
http://www.education-world.com/a_issues/chat/chat206.shtml
No comments:
Post a Comment